Differences of Leadership and Management

December 2, 2011 · admin

leadership vs management

What are differences between leadership and management? The biggest difference between leadership and management is that leaders motivate the people who work or follow them but managers take the people to a difficult way.
Managers, in other words, use their power for authority. For example a manger, in a company, tells people what they do and generally he or she isn’t liked because he behaves people like a robot or blind person without empathy. Also he can use some rewards like extra salaries. Maybe the situation is a result of time and money. Leaders use their power for encouragement. In addition, leaders are also managers but they don’t use their power like a manager because they have volunteers and they want volunteers to do activities which are voluntary.
The leaders are thought to be charismatic, because a leader should attract people attention and charisma is necessary for it. Leaders are thought to be also a hero because they have a nobility side so they affect people.
We can compare the two statuses like that, for example; the manager maintains but the leader develops; the manager relies on control but the leader inspires trust; the manager imitates but the leader originates; the manager focuses on system and structure but the leader focuses on people; the manager seeks for comfort and objectives but the leader seeks for risk and vision; the manager plans every detail but the leader sets directions; the manager has control but the leader has passion.
To sum up, leadership and management are not synonymous, but both of them are important and require. They sometimes meet in a junction because positions of them are almost same if we look at generally, but their areas are different also.

  • Share/Bookmark

Leadership vs management

August 27, 2011 · admin

leadership styles in management

Many people have the wrong concept that both leadership and management are one and the same. But they both have a very wide difference in their meaning. Leadership Vs Management when taken together for analysis one can clearly see the difference.  Leadership is the ability of the person to set a new direction for a group to follow. Management refers to the ability of the person to manage the group as a whole based on the already established principles.  Both management and leadership are required and are an integral part of a company’s success. Both these factors are incomplete without the other. In a company where there is leadership but no management there will be a chaos as there will be no one to manage the newly laid plans to achieve the set goals.
In a company where there is no leadership but efficient management there will be no new rules and goals and the people will be following the same old principles which will never bring about progress. In a company where there is both leadership and management there will be progress and the newly laid plans can be used to achieve the set goals. Sometimes the leadership requires no action like the hunger strike which was called in by Mahatma Gandhi during the fight for Independence. Participative management is a form of leadership which shows a way to progress emerging from the group as a whole rather than the leader. Leadership aims for synthesis while management aims for their analysis.

Many people have the wrong concept that both leadership and management are one and the same. But they both have a very wide difference in their meaning. Leadership Vs Management when taken together for analysis one can clearly see the difference.  Leadership is the ability of the person to set a new direction for a group to follow. Management refers to the ability of the person to manage the group as a whole based on the already established principles.  Both management and leadership are required and are an integral part of a company’s success. Both these factors are incomplete without the other. In a company where there is leadership but no management there will be a chaos as there will be no one to manage the newly laid plans to achieve the set goals. In a company where there is no leadership but efficient management there will be no new rules and goals and the people will be following the same old principles which will never bring about progress. In a company where there is both leadership and management there will be progress and the newly laid plans can be used to achieve the set goals. Sometimes the leadership requires no action like the hunger strike which was called in by Mahatma Gandhi during the fight for Independence. Participative management is a form of leadership which shows a way to progress emerging from the group as a whole rather than the leader. Leadership aims for synthesis while management aims for their analysis.

  • Share/Bookmark